Skip to main content
Logo
File #: Rep-110-25/26    Version: 1 Name:
Type: BOE Report Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/11/2025 In control: Facilities
On agenda: 11/18/2025 Final action:
Title: Define and Approve 18 Board District Priority and Region Priority Projects and Amend the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Incorporate Therein Facilities Services Division
Attachments: 1. Exhibit A - Board District Priority and Region Priority Projects, 2. Exhibit B - BOC Resolution, 3. Exhibit C - BOC Presentation
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

Define and Approve 18 Board District Priority and Region Priority Projects and Amend the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Incorporate Therein

Facilities Services Division

end

 

description

Brief Description:

(Define and Approve 18 Board District Priority and Region Priority Projects and Amend the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to Incorporate Therein) Recommends definition and approval of 18 Board District Priority and Region Priority projects, as detailed in Exhibit A. Also recommends amendment to the Facilities Services Division Strategic Execution Plan to include these projects, with a combined budget of $1,101,388, and authorization for the Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Facilities Executive, or designee(s) to take all legally permissible actions to implement the projects including executing instruments, budget modifications and procurement of necessary equipment and materials.

end

 

Recommendation

Action Proposed:

Define and approve 18 Board District Priority (BDP) and Region Priority (RP) projects, as listed on Exhibit A, and amend the Facilities Services Division (Facilities) Strategic Execution Plan (SEP) to incorporate therein. The total budget for these proposed projects is $1,101,388.

 

Authorize the Chief Procurement Officer and/or the Chief Facilities Executive and/or their designee(s) to execute all instruments necessary, as legally permissible, to implement the proposed projects, including budget modifications and the purchase of equipment and materials.

end

 

Body

Background:

Projects are developed at the discretion of the Board Districts and/or Regions based upon an identified need. These projects are developed with support from Facilities Services Division staff and input from school administrators.

 

Project scopes, schedules, and budgets may vary depending on site conditions and needs. All projects must be capital in nature and adhere to bond language and laws.

 

Bond Oversight Committee Recommendations:

This item was considered by the School Construction Bond Citizens’ Oversight Committee (BOC) at its meeting on November 6, 2025, as referenced in Exhibit B. The presentation that was provided is included as Exhibit C. Staff has concluded that this proposed Facilities SEP amendment is in alignment with BOC recommendations and will facilitate Los Angeles Unified’s ability to successfully implement the Facilities SEP.

 

Expected Outcomes:

Execution of these proposed projects will help improve the learning environment for students, teachers, and staff.

 

Board Options and Consequences:

Adoption of the proposed action will allow staff to execute the projects listed on Exhibit A. Failure to approve this proposed action will delay the projects and ultimately the anticipated benefit to the schools and their students.

 

Policy Implications:

The requested actions are consistent with the Board-Prioritized Facilities Programs for BDP and RP projects and the District’s commitment to address unmet school facilities needs and provide students with a safe and healthy learning environment. The proposed action advances Los Angeles Unified’s 2022-2026 Strategic Plan Pillar 4 Operational Effectiveness Modernizing Infrastructure by providing capital improvements at schools.

 

Budget Impact:

The total combined budget for the 18 proposed projects is $1,101,388. Sixteen projects are funded by Bond Program funds earmarked specifically for BDP projects. Two projects are funded by Bond Program funds earmarked specifically for RP projects.

 

Each project budget was prepared based on the current information known and assumptions about the proposed project scope, site conditions, and market conditions. Individual project budgets will be reviewed throughout the planning, design, and construction phases as new information becomes known or unforeseen conditions arise and will be adjusted accordingly to enable the successful completion of each proposed project.

 

Student Impact:

The proposed projects will upgrade, modernize, and/or improve school facilities to enhance the safety and educational quality of the learning environment to benefit approximately 9,500 current and future students.

 

Equity Impact:

Board Districts and Regions consider a number of factors, including equity, when identifying the need for BDP and RP projects.

 

Issues and Analysis:

This report includes a number of time-sensitive, small to medium-sized projects that have been deemed critical by Board Districts and/or Regions and school administrators.

 

Attachments:

Exhibit A - Board District Priority and Region Priority Projects

Exhibit B - BOC Resolution

Exhibit C - BOC Presentation

 

Submitted:

10/23/25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,                                                               APPROVED BY:

 

 

 

______________________________                                                               _____________________________

ALBERTO M. CARVALHO                                                                    PEDRO SALCIDO

Superintendent                                                                                                         Deputy Superintendent,

                                                                                                                                                   Business Services and Operations

 

 

 

REVIEWED BY:                                                                                                          APPROVED BY:

 

 

 

______________________________                                                               ______________________________

DEVORA NAVERA REED                                                                                    KRISZTINA TOKES

General Counsel                                                                                                         Chief Facilities Executive

                                                                                                                                                   Facilities Services Division

___  Approved as to form.

 

 

 

REVIEWED BY:                                                                                                         PRESENTED BY:

 

 

 

______________________________                                                               _____________________________                     

KURT E. JOHN                                                                                                         MARK CHO

Deputy Chief Financial Officer                                                               Deputy Director of Facilities

                                                                                                                                                   Maintenance and Operations

                                                                                                                                                   Facilities Services Division

___  Approved as to budget impact statement.